“By the Numbers” Pt 1: Cintra’s Toll Estimates

Part One of a four-part series analyzing Cintra’s and NCDOT’s public claims using their own numbers.

A funny thing happens when a company applies for a public loan: they have to make their loan application public. That’s how we discovered Cintra’s toll estimates and traffic projections. You may recall earlier we published a consultant’s estimate. The numbers we present below are Cintra’s own estimates, as well as refinements by the lenders themselves.

C&M performed the traffic and revenue analysis under contract to Cintra.  The data below comes from their April 2014 report.  Lender financial data comes from the official issuing document for the private activity bonds (PABs) dated May 13, 2015.

Cintra Estimates $17 RT When Toll Lanes Open; $44 by 2035

Toll rates by segment are given in the table below. The report has four time segments- AM, Mid-day (MD), PM, and Nighttime (NT).  For simplicity we are reporting only the commuter toll rates, i.e. southbound toll rates in the morning and northbound toll rates in the afternoon.

Toll_Rates_2018

The study assumes the project will open in 2018, so these are the initial rates once dynamic tolling starts.  Note that the total round trip (i.e. from Mooresville to Charlotte) is projected to cost over $15.  These are in 2012 dollars; in current year dollars (assuming 2% inflation), the cost would be $17.05.  This is very close to the $20 cost that we reported earlier, and as been widely reported.

The Mooresville segments are the most expensive, but not a whole lot of people from there are paying attention, so we’ll focus the following analysis on the rest of LKN.

The table below shows the 2035 projected toll rates.

Toll_Rates_2035
A round trip in 2035 is expected to cost $28.24 in 2012 dollars.  Assuming 2% inflation, round trip tolls in 2035 are projected to cost $44.53, again quite close to what we’ve seen projected elsewhere.

Lender Is More Skeptical

The bond underwriters contracted the consulting firm of Ove Arup & Partners, based out of New York City, to review Cintra’s revenue projections. Arup concluded several of Cintra’s assumptions were overly optimistic.  They developed two financial scenarios, called the “Lender’s Base Case” (LBC) and “Lender’s Downside Case” (LDC).

The Lender’s Base Case estimates revenues are 30-40% lower than Cintra’s, and the Lender’s Downside Case is 30- 40% lower than the Base Case.  This has enormous implications for the Fair Market Value calculation of the cancellation penalty.

You may recall in an earlier post we mentioned the $300 million penalty that was supposedly “audited” by North Carolina used Cintra‘s revenue estimates. It was really Cintra’s dream scenario.  An honest attempt at deriving a number would have used the LBC estimates.

We’ll discuss the implications to the penalty amount, as well as what the financing looks like in Part 2.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7 Responses to “By the Numbers” Pt 1: Cintra’s Toll Estimates

  1. David M. Knight says:

    Cancel this Galactically STUPID, financially unviable contract NOW!!!

    Cintra’s project failed in Texas, they cancelled it in Virginia before it started after they realized how totally bogus the numbers were too and they paid a penalty and moved on.

    This has got to be one of the dumbest contracts ever. Nobody can or wants to afford $17 to $44 dollars round trip. Their projections like I’m Texas and elsewhere were seriously overstated like it came from a drunk CPA monkey on crystal meth trying to hump a doorknob. The people by over 97% margin would rather the state add bonds to raise money and widen it ourselves and long term would be dramatically less expensive, and no 50 year BS wher Cintra gets most of the revenue. I truly do not see the benefit to the commuters and taxpayers of NC particularly in the immediate area.

  2. JD says:

    Where can we find the source document for these numbers?

    • A Mooresvile Resident says:

      First, download and READ the full Comprehensive Agreement and the 5 amendments. These are public records. Then go directly to NCDOT website and look things up yourself. Or, you might try to “Google” appropriate phrases.

      Surprising what a little self effort can uncover.

      • JD says:

        Completely unwarranted hostility on your part. It’s a simple question with a simple answer, and I wouldn’t be asking if I hadn’t already Googled it for myself.

    • Widen I-77 says:

      The source document will be available for download in part 3.

  3. Anette says:

    Looking forward to your continued analysis Kurt Naas. Love it when you use their own data to prove how much a scam this really is. And that is what it needs to be called. A political scam. I know you are too polite to say it, but I’m not . It’s one huge SCAM.

  4. gator beach says:

    I really enjoy reading through on this internet site, it
    holds good blog posts.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *